The Discipline Inspection Commission of the Engineering Design Company convened a collective integrity talk for mid-level managers at the beginning of 2024.


Release time:

2024-07-24

“Everyone must further enhance their awareness, clarify their tasks, firmly shoulder their responsibilities, strengthen their learning, and build their capabilities through competence. They should always remain clear-headed, reinforce their sense of discipline and adherence to rules, and maintain strict self-discipline, ensuring that they conduct their work with integrity and avoid any mistakes. In doing so, they must earnestly fulfill their dual responsibilities and live up to the trust and high expectations placed upon them by the organization.” Recently, in the first-floor conference room of the Engineering Design Company, Secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection, Wu Xiaoyan, held an innovative廉政 (integrity) talk with newly appointed managerial personnel.

The Secretary of the Commission for Discipline Inspection got straight to the point, highlighting the potential risks of rent‑seeking temptations as well as the dangers of dereliction of duty, negligence, inaction, and improper conduct that the interviewee might face, thereby helping newly appointed officials identify key integrity‑related risks. He also underscored to leading cadres the importance of upholding “five principles”: political integrity, competence, pragmatism, sound work style, and moral probity.

“This integrity‑building talk has sounded a clear warning: we must remain politically clear‑headed and resolute, maintain transparency in our management, uphold financial integrity, and conduct ourselves with uprightness and honor. As the head of this department, I am the primary person responsible for ensuring that our office fully implements the principal responsibility for exercising strict Party self‑discipline. I must not only take charge of fostering a clean and upright Party conduct within my unit but also safeguard the sound growth and development of our cadres,” said Wang Cheng, Director of the Engineering Economics Office, deeply moved after the conversation.

In addition, this integrity‑related talk made full use of “living case studies,” drawing on typical cases of disciplinary and legal violations uncovered within the enterprise to conduct in-depth education on integrity, discipline, and cautionary lessons. It systematically identified emerging issues and tendencies among the participants, ensuring early detection, timely reminders, and proactive oversight. By doing so, it helped participants tighten the “master switch” of their thinking, sound the “alarm bell” of discipline, and recite the “mantra of integrity,” using real‑world examples to deliver a profound warning to those around them.

        Going forward, the Commission for Discipline Inspection will incorporate the issues and potential risks identified during these talks into its key oversight priorities, leveraging both routine and targeted supervision to ensure that corrective measures are effectively implemented. In doing so, it will diligently follow up on the “second half” of integrity‑related discussions, thereby guaranteeing tangible results.